AMAT 19Logical Equivalence
More
Local first

Logical Equivalence

Core study note

Original study note aligned to the current AMAT 19 course outline

Try it interactively →Practice this concept

Two propositions are logically equivalent when they have the same truth value under every possible assignment of their simple propositions.

That makes equivalence stronger than “these happened to agree in one example.” To disprove equivalence, a single counterexample valuation is enough. To establish semantic equivalence by truth table, every row must match.

Examples worth understanding structurally include the contrapositive, De Morgan transformations, material implication, and double negation. When you are practicing a named rule, however, semantic equivalence alone is not enough: the transformation must match the rule actually cited.

Use the Equivalence lab to predict first, then reveal the complete pair of truth vectors and the first differing row when one exists.

Search AMAT 19

11 results · use ↑ ↓ and Enter

Developer contact

Connect with the person building and maintaining AMAT 19 Study Lab.

Aedrian PonceFounder & Lead Developer